Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.39 seconds)Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sri Vasudeva Rao vs Smt. Shailaja And Ors. on 12 August, 1996
The only stress of the learned Counsel for
the respondent on the following observation of this Court in the Vasudeva Rao's case, supra, was,
"More so, in a situation as the case on hand, no second revision would He when all the persons concerned have been notified, heard and the orders made thereon by the District and Sessions Judge".
Jagir Singh vs Ranbir Singh And Anr. on 8 November, 1978
8. The decision of the Apex Court relied upon by the respondent in Jagir Singh's case, supra, is also to the same effect. It has been laid down that as the object of Section 397(3) is to prevent multiple exercise of revisional powers, the second revision by the same person is prohibited.
Section 500 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
1