Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (0.28 seconds)Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate vs Neela Vijaykumar Bhate on 4 October, 2000
In Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate's case, the facts involved are to the
effect that the wife in that case filed an application for withdrawing her
outrageous statements and that obviously admitted that she made false
allegations in her counter. But, here, it is not the case.
V. Bhagat vs D. Bhagat on 19 November, 1993
In such a case, it is not known as to how the husband
would be able to press the dictum as found set out in V.Bhagat's case.
A. Jayachandra vs Aneel Kaur on 2 December, 2004
(emphasis added.)
It is at once clear that the facts involved in A.Jayachandra's case, can never
be applied to the case on hand.
Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh on 26 March, 2007
In connection with that, he would cite the decision
in Samar Ghosh v. Jaya Ghosh reported in 2007 (3) CTC 464. An excerpt from it,
would run thus:
J.Balasubramaniam vs S.Pitchammal on 9 March, 2007
(ii) J.Balasubramaniam v. S.Pitchammal reported in CDJ 2007 MHC 2038. An
excerpt from it, would run thus:
Narayan Ganesh Dastane vs Sucheta Narayan Dastane on 19 March, 1975
72. The Honourable Apex Court in Dastane v. Dastane reported in AIR 1975
SUPREME COURT 1534 wherein the concept of condonation is found set out. An
excerpt from it, would run thus: