Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 177 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 185 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 197 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 309 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 406 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Maneka Sanjay Gandhi And Anr vs Rani Jethmalani on 23 November, 1978
8. A three Judge Bench of Apex Court in Maneka Sanjay
Gandhi Vs. Rani Jethmalani1 had an occasion to deal with
the scope and ambit of transfer of criminal cases under
Section 406 of Cr.P.C., and held that assurance of a fair trial
is the first imperative of the dispensation of justice and the
central criterion for the court to consider when a motion for
transfer is made is not the hypersensitivity or relative
convenience of a party or easy availability of legal services or
like mini grievances. Something more substantial, more
compelling, more imperiling, from the point of view of public
justice and its attendant environment, is necessitous if the
Court is to exercise its power of transfer. This is the cardinal
principle although the circumstances may be myriad and vary
from case to case. In view of the above principle laid down by
the Apex Court, the grounds raised by the petitioner for
transfer of appeal cannot be considered. The petitioner failed
to make out any ground much less substantial grounds for
transfer of the criminal appeal from one Court to other.
Granting short dates/adjournments by the appellate Court is
not a ground to transfer the appeal. In fact, the petitioner
herein has filed the appeal and therefore he is expected to
pursue the appeal in speedy disposal. Instead, he has filed
1
AIR 1979 SC 468
6
the present petition seeking to transfer. However, the
appellate Court is hearing the matter virtually, and if the
petitioner or his counsel having any difficulty, the same can
be brought to the notice of the appellate Court. Instead of
doing so, the petitioner has filed the present petition alleging
motives including favoritism to the appellate Court. The
petitioner herein failed to substantiate the said contentions.
The other allegations are general in nature.
Section 470 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1