Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.53 seconds)

Tej Parkash vs The State Of Haryana on 13 October, 1995

26. The two words "takes" and "entices" as used in Section 361 IPC are intended to be read together so that each takes, to some extent, its colour and content from the other. If the minor leaves her parental home completely uninfluenced by any promise, offer or inducement emanating from the guilty party, then the latter cannot be considered to have committed the offence as defined under Section 361 IPC. Reliance in this regard may be placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the matter of 'Parkash Vs. State of Haryana' reported as 2004 (1) SCC 339. The distinction is however in "taking" from "allowing" a minor to accompany. The act of allowing would not be an act attracting the penal consequences under Section 361 of IPC.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 39 - B N Kirpal - Full Document
1   2 Next