Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.55 seconds)Section 4 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
Section 32 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
Section 245B in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
The Customs Tariff Act, 1975
Section 127 in The Central Excise Act, 1944 [Entire Act]
M/S.Australian Foods Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Central Excise on 5 March, 2010
(hereafter 'Australian Food') to hold that
disputed questions of fact and law ought not to be entertained by it. The
relevant para of Australian Food (Supra) reads:
The Customs Act, 1962
Union Of India And Anr. vs Dharampal Satyapal And Ors. on 27 September, 2013
30. The minority view, to the effect that the Settlement Commission itself
has to decide all such factual issues, even if they involve a complication,
without sending the case back for adjudication, is contrary to the view of
this Court in Dharampal Satyapal (Supra).
Director General Of Central Excise ... vs Murarilal Harishchandra Jaiswal Pvt ... on 17 September, 2010
31. The judgment in Director General of Central Excise Intelligence v.
Murarilal Harishchandra Jaiswal Pvt. Ltd. 2013 (291) ELT 484 (Del),
relied upon in the minority view, is clearly distinguishable, inasmuch as, in
the said case the question was only as to the rate of customs duty.