Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.79 seconds)Rajammal vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Another on 14 December, 1998
8.In Rajammal Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, reported in 1999(1)SCC 417, the
Apex Court has held that the representation was received by the Secretary to the
Government on 05.02.1998, the Government which received the remarks from
different authorities submitted the relevant files before the under Secretary
for processing it on the next day. Thereafter, the files were submitted to the
Minister, who received it on tour. Finding that there was no valid explanation
for the delay from 09.02.1998 to 14.02.1998, the Apex Court held that the delay
has vitiated the detention.
Jayanarayan Sukul vs State Of West Bengal on 5 November, 1969
9.After extracting the ratio decided in Jayanarayan Sukul Vs. State of
West Bengal, reported in 1970 (1)SCC 219 Mahesh KUmar Chauhan alias Banti Vs.
Union of India reported in 1990(3) SCC 148 and Rama Dhondu Borade Vs. V.K.Saraf,
Commissioner of Police reported in 1989 (3) SCC 173, a Division Bench of this
Court in Ramamurthy Vs., the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary
to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St., George, Chennai -
600 009 and another reported in 2006(4) CTC 181 in paragraph 4 of the decision
has held as follows:
Mahesh Kumar Chauhan @ Banti vs Union Of India And Ors on 2 May, 1990
9.After extracting the ratio decided in Jayanarayan Sukul Vs. State of
West Bengal, reported in 1970 (1)SCC 219 Mahesh KUmar Chauhan alias Banti Vs.
Union of India reported in 1990(3) SCC 148 and Rama Dhondu Borade Vs. V.K.Saraf,
Commissioner of Police reported in 1989 (3) SCC 173, a Division Bench of this
Court in Ramamurthy Vs., the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary
to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St., George, Chennai -
600 009 and another reported in 2006(4) CTC 181 in paragraph 4 of the decision
has held as follows:
Rama Dhondu Borade vs V.K. Saraf, Commissioner Of Police & Ors on 5 May, 1989
9.After extracting the ratio decided in Jayanarayan Sukul Vs. State of
West Bengal, reported in 1970 (1)SCC 219 Mahesh KUmar Chauhan alias Banti Vs.
Union of India reported in 1990(3) SCC 148 and Rama Dhondu Borade Vs. V.K.Saraf,
Commissioner of Police reported in 1989 (3) SCC 173, a Division Bench of this
Court in Ramamurthy Vs., the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary
to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St., George, Chennai -
600 009 and another reported in 2006(4) CTC 181 in paragraph 4 of the decision
has held as follows:
S.V. Ramamurthy vs The Secretary To Government Of Tamil ... on 28 April, 2006
9.After extracting the ratio decided in Jayanarayan Sukul Vs. State of
West Bengal, reported in 1970 (1)SCC 219 Mahesh KUmar Chauhan alias Banti Vs.
Union of India reported in 1990(3) SCC 148 and Rama Dhondu Borade Vs. V.K.Saraf,
Commissioner of Police reported in 1989 (3) SCC 173, a Division Bench of this
Court in Ramamurthy Vs., the State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary
to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St., George, Chennai -
600 009 and another reported in 2006(4) CTC 181 in paragraph 4 of the decision
has held as follows:
Ichhu Devi Choraria vs Union Of India & Ors on 9 September, 1980
6.In Icchu Devi Choraria Vs. Union of India reported in 1980 (4) SCC 531,
the Apex Court has held as follows: