Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010 In view of ratio laid down in Mr. R.D. Hattangadi v. M/s Pest Control (supra) and Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar (supra) , the compensation to which the petitioner is entitled shall be as under:- Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3811 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
Section 338 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act] Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 31082
Section 304A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act] Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 35720
Section 427 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act] Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 108144
Section 173 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act] Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 37168
Section 168 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act] Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 6092
Section 279 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act] Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 65927
Bimla Devi & Ors vs Himachal Road Transport Corpn. & Ors on 15 April, 2009 No. 550/2011 decided on 02.07.2012, Bimla Devi & Others v. Himachal Road Transport Corporation & Others (2009) 13 SC 530, Parmeshwari v. Amirchand & Others 2011 (1) SCR 1096 and Mangla Ram v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Others 2018 Law Suit (SC) 303. Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 2658 - S B Sinha - Full Document
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009 In death cases, the guidelines for computation of compensation have been laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Sarla Verma and Others v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. (2009) 6 Supreme Court Cases 121. Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 20141 - R V Raveendran - Full Document