Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)Hanumantha Gowda vs Devaraju on 31 May, 1995
34. To hold such a view, I find support from the decisions in Hanumantha Gowda v. Devaraju ; Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata 1976 ACJ 141 (SC); and Punam-bhai Khodabhai Parmar v. G. Kenel Construction 1984 ACJ 739 (Gujarat).
Pratap Narain Singh Deo vs Srinivas Sabata And Anr on 4 December, 1975
34. To hold such a view, I find support from the decisions in Hanumantha Gowda v. Devaraju ; Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata 1976 ACJ 141 (SC); and Punam-bhai Khodabhai Parmar v. G. Kenel Construction 1984 ACJ 739 (Gujarat).
Punambhai Khodabhai Parmar vs G. Kenel Construction And Anr. on 20 February, 1984
34. To hold such a view, I find support from the decisions in Hanumantha Gowda v. Devaraju ; Pratap Narain Singh Deo v. Srinivas Sabata 1976 ACJ 141 (SC); and Punam-bhai Khodabhai Parmar v. G. Kenel Construction 1984 ACJ 739 (Gujarat).
The Management Of Sree Lalithambika ... vs S. Kailasam on 12 March, 1986
42. The observation made by this court in Sree Lalithambika Enterprises, Salem v. Kailasam 1980 ACJ 321 (Madras), in this contest, is quite relevant:
Section 4 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
1