Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)Shakti Devi vs New India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 9 November, 2010
Another
Division Bench in 2017(2) TN MAC 73 (R.Vijayalakshmi vs M.
Muthu Viswanath), following the consistent view taken by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments in (i) Shakti Devi v. New
India Insurance Co. Ltd. and another, [2010 (2) TN MAC 612]
(SC); (ii) National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shyam Singh and
others, [2011 (2) TN MAC 317] (SC) and (iii) Vijay Shankar
Shinde
http://www.judis.nic.in and others v. State of Maharastra, [2008 (2) SCC 670],
10
has opined that between the age of the deceased of a road accident,
and the age of the claimant, whichever is higher of the two, is liable
to be taken into account and consideration for determining
compensation.
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Shyam Singh & Ors on 4 July, 2011
Another
Division Bench in 2017(2) TN MAC 73 (R.Vijayalakshmi vs M.
Muthu Viswanath), following the consistent view taken by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments in (i) Shakti Devi v. New
India Insurance Co. Ltd. and another, [2010 (2) TN MAC 612]
(SC); (ii) National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shyam Singh and
others, [2011 (2) TN MAC 317] (SC) and (iii) Vijay Shankar
Shinde
http://www.judis.nic.in and others v. State of Maharastra, [2008 (2) SCC 670],
10
has opined that between the age of the deceased of a road accident,
and the age of the claimant, whichever is higher of the two, is liable
to be taken into account and consideration for determining
compensation.
Vijay Shankar Shinde & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 January, 2008
Another
Division Bench in 2017(2) TN MAC 73 (R.Vijayalakshmi vs M.
Muthu Viswanath), following the consistent view taken by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments in (i) Shakti Devi v. New
India Insurance Co. Ltd. and another, [2010 (2) TN MAC 612]
(SC); (ii) National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shyam Singh and
others, [2011 (2) TN MAC 317] (SC) and (iii) Vijay Shankar
Shinde
http://www.judis.nic.in and others v. State of Maharastra, [2008 (2) SCC 670],
10
has opined that between the age of the deceased of a road accident,
and the age of the claimant, whichever is higher of the two, is liable
to be taken into account and consideration for determining
compensation.
Salini vs Meiyarasu on 4 October, 2012
16.In similar circumstances, the Division Bench of this Court in
2012(2) TN MAC 838 (Salini vs. Meiyarasu), has held that if the
deceased is a bachelor and the claimants are parents, proper
multiplier shall be adopted taking the age of the mother.
R.Vijayalakshmi vs M.Muthu Viswanath on 11 April, 2017
Another
Division Bench in 2017(2) TN MAC 73 (R.Vijayalakshmi vs M.
Muthu Viswanath), following the consistent view taken by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the judgments in (i) Shakti Devi v. New
India Insurance Co. Ltd. and another, [2010 (2) TN MAC 612]
(SC); (ii) National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shyam Singh and
others, [2011 (2) TN MAC 317] (SC) and (iii) Vijay Shankar
Shinde
http://www.judis.nic.in and others v. State of Maharastra, [2008 (2) SCC 670],
10
has opined that between the age of the deceased of a road accident,
and the age of the claimant, whichever is higher of the two, is liable
to be taken into account and consideration for determining
compensation.
1