Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.23 seconds)
Union Bank Of India vs The Appellate Authority Under The ... on 14 May, 2026 cites

Principal Secy. Govt. Of A.P. & Anr vs M. Adinarayana on 6 October, 2004

i. (2020) 18 SCC 71 in Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Mahanadi Coalfields Limited Versus. Rabindranath Choubey, ii. (2004) 12 SCC 579 in Principal Secretary, Govt.Of A.P. Vs. M. Adinarayana, 12 2026:CHC-AS:731 "26. In our opinion, judicial review cannot extend to the examination of the correctness of the charges as it is not an appeal but only a review of the manner in which the decision was made. We have, therefore, no hesitation in Setting aside the order of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court for reasons stated (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 72 - A R Lakshmanan - Full Document

Y.K. Singla vs Punjab National Bank & Ors on 14 December, 2012

43. The respondent no. 3 submits that in the case of Y.K. Singla v. Punjab National Bank, (2013) 3 SCC 472, while considering the issue of interest on the late payment of gratuity to a retired employee of Punjab National Bank held that the payment of Gratuity Act will override the Punjab National Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 (for short "1995 Pension Regulations"). While dealing with the issue of recovery from gratuity under Regulation 46 or withholding of pension under Regulation 46(2) of the said Regulations, the Court in paragraph 22, after referring to Section 14 of the Gratuity Act, held:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 110 - J S Khehar - Full Document
1   2 Next