Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.39 seconds)
Gnana Bharathi Educational Academy vs A.P. State Council Of Higher Education ... on 23 July, 2003 cites

S. Azeez Basha And Anr vs Union Of India on 20 October, 1967

17. As noticed, the learned Counsel for the petitioner relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in Azeez Basha v. Union of India (supra). In the said decision, the Supreme Court laid down that an educational institution includes University also and, therefore, minorities have a fundamental right to establish a University under Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India. Having regard to the provisions of Section 1(3)(iii) of the Education Act, when the application of the Act is specifically excluded, the said decision has no application. It is now well settled that the words and terms and phrases used in the enactment have to be interpreted in the light of the interpreting Clause. If the word has no definition in the enactment, it has to be interpreted having regard to the precedents. Even if any precedent is not available, the Court can always rely on Dictionaries and Thesaurus, By interpreting the words and terms in the definition "educational institution", it is not possible to countenance the submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner that the University is an educational institution for the purpose of the Education Act. It is no doubt true that Dravidian University is an educational institution, but it is not so for the purpose of the A.P. Education Act, 1982.
Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 100 - K N Wanchoo - Full Document

Bharathidasan University & Anr vs All India Council For Technical ... on 24 September, 2001

In Bharatidasan University v. All India Council for Technical Education, AIR 2001 SC 2861, the Supreme Court considered the question whether the University created under a special enactment should seek approval of AICTE to start a department for imparting course of technical education or a technical institution. After referring to the various provisions of AICTE Act, 1987, University Grants Cbmmission Act, 1956, the apex Court laid down that a University established under a special enactment is not required to seek prior approval to commence a new department or a new course. The following observations are apt.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 209 - Full Document
1   2 Next