Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.21 seconds)
Sutlej Construction Limited vs Union Territory Of Chandigarh on 5 December, 2017 cites

Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014

11. It has been opined by this Court that when it comes to setting aside of an award under the public policy ground, it would mean that the award should shock the conscience of the court and would not include what the court thinks is unjust on the facts of the case seeking to substitute its view for that of the arbitrator to do what it considers to be “justice.” (Associate Builders v. Delhi Development Authority1)
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 2182 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Sudarsan Trading Co vs Govt. Of Kerala & Anr on 14 February, 1989

12. The approach adopted by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh was, thus, correct in not getting into the act of re-appreciating the evidence as 1 (2015) 3 SCC 49 77 the first appellate court from a trial court decree. An arbitrator is a chosen Judge by the parties and it is on limited parameters can the award be interfered with. (Sudarsan Trading Co. v. The Government of Kerala2; Harish Chander & Co. v. State of U.P.3 and Swan Gold Mining v. Hindustan Copper Limited4).
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 613 - S Mukharji - Full Document

M/S. Harish Chandra & Company vs State Of U.P. Thr. Superintending Eng on 8 September, 2016

12. The approach adopted by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh was, thus, correct in not getting into the act of re-appreciating the evidence as 1 (2015) 3 SCC 49 77 the first appellate court from a trial court decree. An arbitrator is a chosen Judge by the parties and it is on limited parameters can the award be interfered with. (Sudarsan Trading Co. v. The Government of Kerala2; Harish Chander & Co. v. State of U.P.3 and Swan Gold Mining v. Hindustan Copper Limited4).
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 43 - A M Sapre - Full Document

Swan Gold Mining Ltd vs Hindustan Copper Ltd on 22 September, 2014

12. The approach adopted by the learned Additional District Judge, Chandigarh was, thus, correct in not getting into the act of re-appreciating the evidence as 1 (2015) 3 SCC 49 77 the first appellate court from a trial court decree. An arbitrator is a chosen Judge by the parties and it is on limited parameters can the award be interfered with. (Sudarsan Trading Co. v. The Government of Kerala2; Harish Chander & Co. v. State of U.P.3 and Swan Gold Mining v. Hindustan Copper Limited4).
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 164 - M Y Eqbal - Full Document
1