Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Sri Laxmi Oil Mills on 25 November, 1983 cites

M. V. Joshi vs M. U. Shimpi And Another on 27 February, 1961

14&4&77 oknh vads 113&10 iSls deh U;k; 'kqYd nkf[ky djrs gSa A U;k; 'kqYd ;Fks"B gS A Hkk"kk i= LohÑr fd;k x;k A oknh lEeu ekSluk jft- fyQkQ ds lkFk nkf[ky djrs gS A fnukad 2&5&77 vafdr dj lEeu jft- }kjk Hkstk tk; A                                             g- A& vLi"V                                             v U;k- 2 2&5&77 oknh gktjh nsrs gSa A lEeu jft-
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 67 - R Dayal - Full Document

Express Cables Pvt. Ltd. vs N.S. Mukherjee And Anr. on 16 March, 1983

In a previous decision by us reported in the case of Express Cables Pvt. Ltd. v. N. S. Mukherjee AIR 1983 Patna 269) we had stated that Order 5, Rule 19-A (2) provides a procedure that after a postal notice is sent to a defendant in the suit and the postal acknowledgement is received with an endorsement purported to have been made by a postal employee that the defendant or his agent refused to take delivery of the notice the Court shall declare by its order that the summons had been duly served on the defendant. When the acknowledgement is not received back within thirty days from the date of issue of summons the Court saay make a declaration to the effect that the summonses were duly served notwithstanding the fact that the acknowledgement having been lost or mislaid or for any other reason has not been received by the Court. This is a condition precedent for the Court to proceed further with the hearing of the suit. In this case it is an admitted position that such a declaration was not made by the court below. It is, therefore, obvious that a date could not have been fixed for ex parte hearing.
Patna High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document
1