Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 16 (0.56 seconds)

Sweta Estates Private Limited vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 16 October, 2020

"That the petitioner has sought quashing of the impugned FIR while relying upon "Sandeep Gandotra vs. U.T., Chandigarh & Sweta Estate Private Limited vs. State of Haryana & Others wherein this Hon'ble High Court quashed FIR under Section 188 IPC while interpreting Section 195 Cr.P.C. It is respectfully submitted that there is no dispute with regard to ratio of law, however, the facts of the present case are distinguishable from the facts of the cases relied upon by the petitioner."
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 107 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Ashok Kumar Gandotra And vs U.T. Of J&K on 4 July, 2022

"That the petitioner has sought quashing of the impugned FIR while relying upon "Sandeep Gandotra vs. U.T., Chandigarh & Sweta Estate Private Limited vs. State of Haryana & Others wherein this Hon'ble High Court quashed FIR under Section 188 IPC while interpreting Section 195 Cr.P.C. It is respectfully submitted that there is no dispute with regard to ratio of law, however, the facts of the present case are distinguishable from the facts of the cases relied upon by the petitioner."
Jammu & Kashmir High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - V C Koul - Full Document
1   2 Next