Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.29 seconds)Amrik Singh And Anr. vs Karnail Singh And Ors. on 2 May, 1974
There is no doubt to the ratio decidendi culled out in
Amrik Singh's case (supra) wherein in para 24, it has been held as
under:-
Gurpreet Singh vs Chatterbhuj Goel on 29 April, 1991
Per contra, Mr. Gopal Sharma, learned counsel appearing
for respondent No.1(b) submitted that genesis of the judgment for
setting aside the decree was reliance upon judgment rendered by this
Court in Gurpreet Singh Vs. Chatterbhuj Goel 1991(2) RRR 504
whereby Division Bench of this Court categorically held that guardian,
who acted for the minor is not clothed with requisite authority to act as
2 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 10-06-2019 00:53:44 :::
C.R. No.3343 of 2017 (O&M) -3-
such. Even as per the amended provisions of Order 32 Rule 3 and 4
CPC as applicable while filing the suit, plaintiff is required to attach
with the plaint list of relatives with their addressees, thus, suit against
the minor was not maintainable and rightly so, the objections have been
allowed.
Baldev Singh And Ors. vs Sukhdev Singh And Ors. on 17 March, 2006
In support of contention, relied upon judgments passed by
this Court in Raj Kumar Vs. Rohtash 2010(3) PLR 187; Baldev Singh
and others Vs. Sukhdev Singh and others 2006(3) RCR (Civil) 76,
thus, urges this Court for dismissal of the revision petition.
Article 60 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Amir Bala And Anr. vs Swaran Singh And Ors. on 12 July, 2006
1974 PLR 744, Amir Bala and another Vs. Swaran Singh
and others 2006(4) RCR (Civil) 75 and Rajinder Kumar Vs. Sanatam
Dharam Mahabir Dal 1999(1) RCR (Civil) 713.
Raj Kumar And Others vs Rohtash And Others on 14 May, 2010
In support of contention, relied upon judgments passed by
this Court in Raj Kumar Vs. Rohtash 2010(3) PLR 187; Baldev Singh
and others Vs. Sukhdev Singh and others 2006(3) RCR (Civil) 76,
thus, urges this Court for dismissal of the revision petition.
Rajesh Kumar vs Balwan Singh And Another on 9 July, 2008
The present revision petition is directed at the instance of
the petitioner-plaintiff against the impugned order dated 31.01.2017
whereby objection of the defendants qua execution of the ex parte
judgment and decree dated 30.07.2009 passed in Civil Suit No.946 of
2003 titled as 'Rajesh Vs. Balwan Singh and others' has been allowed.
1