Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.53 seconds)
Smt. Bethala Vijaya Kumari vs The State Of Telangana And 2 Others on 25 November, 2022 cites

Satyawati Sharma (Dead) By Lrs vs Union Of India & Another on 16 April, 2008

27. Before adverting to the respective contentions urged, it is to be noted that in service jurisprudence, recruitment is undertaken through two types of selection process/modes, viz., (i) by open competitive exam and (ii) limited competitive exam. While the criteria for selection through open competitive exam is elaborate and descriptive, in the case of recruitment through limited competitive exam, the selection criteria stands on a different footing and is restrictive like from and amongst certain category of employees, educational qualifications etc. The above view is supported by the decision of the Supreme Court in S.S.Sharma v. Union of India2.
Supreme Court of India Cites 77 - Cited by 1265 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Arti Kumari Singh And Ors vs The Patna High Court, Through The ... on 18 October, 2019

28. In the facts of the present case, since the selection is restricted to Anganwadi Teachers (women), on account of their special eligibility, and are allowed to compete at the exam to be held for selection from and among such candidates the selection process is to be held as through 'limited competitive exam'. In other words, an open competitive exam is general in nature where the participation is extended to a wide variety of individuals fulfilling the eligibility criteria prescribed, whereas in a limited competitive examination, the 2 1981 SCR (1) 1184=1981 AIR 588 10 participation is restricted only to select few individuals, who fulfill the said eligible criteria prescribed under the notification. Thus, discretion is vested in the hands of the authority conducting the exam to specify such criteria which may be different for an open competitive exam and a limited competitive exam. The Patna High Court had an occasion to consider different selection criteria being applied for limited competitive examination in the case of Arti Kumari Singh v. The Patna High Court3.
Patna High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 12 - A P Sahi - Full Document

Chandra Prakash Tiwari And Ors vs Shakuntala Shukla And Ors on 9 May, 2002

In Chandra Prakash Tiwari v. Shakuntala Shukla7, this Court laid down the principle that when a candidate appears at an examination without objection and is subsequently found to be not successful, a challenge to the process is precluded. The question of entertaining a petition challenging an examination would not arise where a candidate has appeared and participated. He or she cannot subsequently turn around and contend that the process was unfair or that there was a lacuna therein, merely because the result is not palatable.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 400 - U C Banerjee - Full Document
1   2 Next