Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.37 seconds)Article 54 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 53 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Motilal Jain vs Smt.Ramdasi Devi & Ors on 20 July, 2000
In support of his submission, Mr. Ikbal has referred to a
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, in the case of Motilal Jain
Vs. Smt. Ramdasi Devi & Others, reported in (2000) 6 SCC
Saradamani Kandappan vs S. Rajalakshmi & Ors on 4 July, 2011
In support of his submission, Mr. Ghosh has referred to a
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Saradamani
Kandappan Vs. S. Rajalakshmi & Others, reported in (2011)
Page No.# 15/21
12 SCC 18.
P.Daivasigamani vs S.Sambandan on 12 October, 2022
17. Reference in this context can be made to a decision in P.
Daivasigamani Vs S. Sambandan, decided on 12
October,2022 (Civil Appeal No. 9006 of 2021), wherein,
the Hon'ble Supreme Court, while dealing with the issue of limitation
in filing suit for specific performance of contract, has held as under:-
Jegannathan vs Raju Sigamani & Anr on 2 April, 2012
18. It is also to be noted here that while dealing with the issue of
remand, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Jegannathan v. Raju
Sigamani, reported in (2012) 5 SCC 540, held that if the appellate
court holds that the trial court that passed the decree omitted to frame
or try any issue or determine any question of fact essential to decide
the matter finally, the appellate court, invoking the provision of Order
41 Rule 25 CPC, may remit the matter and also it may direct taking of
evidence. The relevant para is reproduced herein below:-
Section 96 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
1