Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.98 seconds)
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Pramod Kumar Jain Through Lrs Smt Mohini ... on 20 January, 2026
cites
Major U.R. Bhatt vs Union Of India on 6 May, 1960
4. At the out set, learned counsel for the appellants/State submits that
consultation with the State Public Service Commission in the matter of
pension is not compulsory as mandated by the Apex Court in the case
of Major U.R.Bhatt Vs. Union of India - AIR 1962 SC 1344.
Jarnail Singh vs The Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs ... on 3 December, 1992
11. So far as withholding of entire pension permanently is concerned,
Apex Court in the case of Jarnail Singh (supra) has given the guidelines in
following manner :-
Radha Krishna Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 August, 2021
10. Considering the rival submissions and going through the language
of Rule 15 (3) of the Rules of 1966 and Rule 9 of the Rules of 1976 as well
as judgments of the Division Bench in the case of Radha Krishna Sharma
(supra) and Dhirendra Kumar Dubey (supra), it appears that consultation
with the State Public Service Commission (PSC) is mandatory and therefore,
if the consultation with PSC is not carried out, then it vitiates the proceeding.
The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Dhirendra Kumar Dubey on 13 September, 2023
10. Considering the rival submissions and going through the language
of Rule 15 (3) of the Rules of 1966 and Rule 9 of the Rules of 1976 as well
as judgments of the Division Bench in the case of Radha Krishna Sharma
(supra) and Dhirendra Kumar Dubey (supra), it appears that consultation
with the State Public Service Commission (PSC) is mandatory and therefore,
if the consultation with PSC is not carried out, then it vitiates the proceeding.
1