cites: 193233098

1 - 7 of 7 (0.17 seconds)

M/S. Krishna Fashion vs Union Of India & Ors. on 18 January, 2022 cites

M/S Radha Krishan Industries vs The State Of Himachal Pradesh on 20 April, 2021

She relies on the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Radha Krishan Industries Vs. State of H.P., (2021) 6 SCC 771.

Supreme Court of India Cites 58 - Cited by 296 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Section 62 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 133

Section 63 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 111

Section 64 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 109

Section 67 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 286

Section 73 in The Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [Entire Act]

Union of India - Section Cites 0 - Cited by 390

M/S Shri Dhan Laxmi Trade House Pvt. Ltd. vs Principal Commissioner Of Goods And ... on 22 November, 2021

In support of her submissions, she relies upon the judgment of this Court in M/s. Shri Dhan Laxmi Trade House Vs. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax, 2021 (11) TMI 863. She further states that the impugned order does not disclose the pendency of any proceeding under Sections 62, 63, 64, 67, 73 or 74 of the GST Acts, which can justify the provisional attachment order.

Delhi High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Manmohan - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results