Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 26 (0.63 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 106 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Bhagat Ram vs State Of Punjab on 9 February, 1954
In Bhagat Ram v. State of Punjab, AIR 1954 SC 621, it was
laid down that where the case depends upon the conclusion drawn from
circumstances, the cumulative effect of the circumstances must be such as
to negative the innocence of the accused and bring home the offences beyond
any reasonable doubt."
Padala Veera Reddy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 26 October, 1989
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. and Ors., 1989 Supp. (2)
SCC 706, it was laid down that in a case of circumstantial evidence such
evidence must satisfy the following test:-
Gambhir vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 April, 1982
(3) the circumstances, taken cumulatively, should form a chain so
complete that there is no escape from the conclusion that within all human
probability the crime was committed by the accused and none else; and
(4) the circumstantial evidence in order to sustain conviction must be
complete and incapable of explanation of any other hypothesis than that of
the guilt of the accused and such evidence should not only be consistent
with the guilt of the accused but should be inconsistent with his
innocence. (See Gambhir v. State of Maharashtra (1982) 2 SCC 351)."
Gosu Jairami Reddy & Anr vs State Of A.P on 26 July, 2011
In
support of his contention, learned counsel for the respondent-State relied
upon the judgment of this Court in Gosu Jayarami Reddy and Anr. vs. State
of Andhra Pradesh, (2011) 11 SCC 766 wherein it was observed as under:-
Thakur Prasad vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 27 January, 1953
"52. We may at the threshold say that a finding of fact concurrently
recorded on the question of alibi is not disturbed by this Court in an
appeal by special leave. The legal position in this regard is settled by
the decision of this Court in Thakur Prasad v. State of M.P. (AIR 1954 SC
30 at p. 31, para 2)
[pic]
"2. The plea of alibi involves a question of fact and both the courts below
have concurrently found that fact against the appellant Thakur Prasad. This
Court, therefore, cannot, on an appeal by special leave, go behind that
concurrent finding of fact."