Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.22 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Kantamaneni Ravishankar vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 26 August, 2020
In support of his contention, he has also relied
on the judgment of this Court reported in 2020 SCC
OnLine AP 726 in the case of Kantamaneni Ravishankar
Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh wherein it is held at para
No.70 that the posting that was in the Youtube is only to
insult the Government and the present Chief Minister
and the Government and the Chief Minister cannot
constitute one group or two groups. Therefore, it does
not constitute an offence punishable under Section
505(2) IPC.
Bilal Ahmed Kaloo vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 6 August, 1997
At para 61 of the judgment, the judgment of
the Apex Court in "Bilal Ahmed Kaloo Vs. State of Andhra
Pradesh" was also referred stating that the Apex Court
drawn the distinction between Section 153A of IPC and
Section 505 (2) of I.P.C wherein it is held by the Apex
Court that the common ingredient in both the offences is
promoting feeling of enmity, hatred or ill-will between
different religious or racial or linguistic or regional
groups or castes or communities. Therefore, Section
153A covers a case where a person by words, either
spoken or written, or by signs or by visible
representations attempts to promote such feelings and
under Section 505(2) IPC, promotion of such feelings
should have been done by making and publishing or
circulating any statement or report containing rumor or
alarming news. Finally, this Court held that the facts of
the case do not constitute any offence under Section
153A or 505(2) IPC.
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1