Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.71 seconds)Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Khajjan Singh And Others vs State Of Haryana And Others on 28 May, 2014
Relying on the decision in Chabbi Lal's case (supra) in CWP No. 11209 of 2015
titled 'Surinder Pal Vs. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and others' decided
on 19.05.2017 against which LPA No. 570 of 2017 has been dismissed on 25.08.2017
and also in 'Khajjan Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana', 2015 1 S.C.T. 604, I had
allowed similar claims for regularization of services.
Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd And ... vs Madan Lal And Ors on 12 July, 2022
14. Madan Lal's case was taken up in an intra Court appeal being
LPA-1316 of 2018 Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited and others
Vs. Madan Lal and others which was dismissed by a Division Bench on
12.07.2022 by holding as follows:-
Sheo Narain Nagar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 13 November, 2017
It is also to be noticed that in Sheo Narain Nagar & others Vs. State of
Uttar Pradesh & others, AIR 2018 SC 233, a similar issue arose before the Apex
Court regarding the regularization not granted by the High Court of Allahabad
despite the fact that the Government employees had been working on daily wage
basis since August, 1993. The Apex Court noticed that the employees who had
rendered service for about 24 years and only on account of the fact that the
appointments were irregular but not back-door entry or illegal appointments, the
benefit of regularization had to be granted.
Divisional Forest Officer (T) Jhajjar & ... vs Sh. Sher Singh & Another on 8 November, 2016
3. On 01.08.1994, the respondent was appointed as a Mali-cum-
Baildar in the Forest Department, Haryana. His appointment was on daily
wage basis. On 01.01.1998 his services were terminated. He knocked the
doors of the Labour Court to challenge therein his termination. Through
award dated 18.04.2006 the Labour Court held that the respondent's services
had been illegally terminated and resultantly ordered his reinstatement with
continuity of service with 50 percent back wages from the date he had
served the demand notice upon the State with regard to wrongful termination
1 of 11
::: Downloaded on - 26-10-2024 21:20:51 :::
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:127795-DB
LPA-2356-2024 (O&M) 2
of his services. The State challenged the award of the Labour Court before
this Court through CWP-13040-2007 - Divisional Forest Officer Rohtak
Vs. Sher Singh and another. When the said writ petition came up for final
hearing on 20.12.2017 it came to light that the award of the Labour Court
stood implemented by the State and in view of this development this Court
was of the opinion that the impugned award of the Labour Court warranted
no interference. Accordingly, the State's petition was disposed of by granting
liberty to the respondent to approach the concerned authority seeking
regularization of his services. Thereafter, the respondent continued to serve
the appellant-State and on 06.02.2018 got served upon the State a legal
notice seeking therein regularization of his services in terms of the
Regularization Policy of the State dated 01.10.2003. On 09.03.2018, the
State rejected the respondent's claim which became the subject matter of
challenge at the respondent's behest before this Court.
Madan Lal And Ors vs Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd And ... on 1 February, 2018
15. Judgments in Chabbi Lal's case (supra) and Madan Lal's case
(supra) were then followed by us in another matter raising similar questions
as in the present case being LPA-1649-2024 - Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran
Nigam Limited and others Vs. Babli Devi and another.
Laxmi Devi vs Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd And ... on 19 January, 2018
In our
considered opinion, the issue as conceded by Mr.Nalwa also is that the policy in
question does also apply to part-time workers and therefore the judgment of Ilmo
Devi (supra) shall not be applicable.
Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Ltd. And ... vs Chhabi Lal And Ors on 10 October, 2017
11. The judgment of the learned Single Judge was challenged by the
Nigam through an intra court appeal being LPA-1700-2015- Haryana Vidyut
Parsaran Nigam Ltd. and others Vs. Chhabi Lal and others which was
dismissed by a Division Bench of this Court on 10.10.2017. The operative part
of such judgment reads as under: -
Darshan Lal Chhabra vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 28 August, 2014
When confronted with the contention advanced by the State that though the
petitioners are working as Malis, Sweepers etc. for over two decades but their cases
for regularization could not be considered since there were no regular sanctioned
posts, this Court in CWP No. 2326 of 2011, titled 'Chhabi Lal and others Vs. The
State of Haryana and others' decided on 20.05.2015 rejected the argument holding
that once they have been allowed to work for such a long period of time, it cannot be
countenanced that the posts were not regular in nature.