Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (1.37 seconds)

Indian Bank vs M/S Blue Jaggers Estates Ltd on 9 August, 2010

The plaintiffs cannot by clever drafting seek to create an illusion of a cause of action and thereby continue with an action in a civil Court bypassing the provisions of special statutes. The purpose and object of the special statures are required to be kept in mind while considering the claims made in the plaint. Parliament enacted SARFEASI Act because it was found that the legal mechanism available till then was wholly insufficient for recovery of the outstanding dues of banks and financial institutions [United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tandon & Anr.]:2010(8)SCC 110 and Indian Bank vs. Blue Jaggers Estates Limited & Ors. : 2010(8)SCC 129) The plaint, as it stands, in my view, is not maintainable in this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 38 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

United Bank Of India vs Satyawati Tondon & Ors on 26 July, 2010

The plaintiffs cannot by clever drafting seek to create an illusion of a cause of action and thereby continue with an action in a civil Court bypassing the provisions of special statutes. The purpose and object of the special statures are required to be kept in mind while considering the claims made in the plaint. Parliament enacted SARFEASI Act because it was found that the legal mechanism available till then was wholly insufficient for recovery of the outstanding dues of banks and financial institutions [United Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tandon & Anr.]:2010(8)SCC 110 and Indian Bank vs. Blue Jaggers Estates Limited & Ors. : 2010(8)SCC 129) The plaint, as it stands, in my view, is not maintainable in this Court.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 3973 - Full Document
1