Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (7.31 seconds)

Dharam Das Wadhwani vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 14 March, 1974

90.This appeal reminds us of Justice V.R.Krishna Iyer's observations in Dharm Das Wadhwani Vs. State of U.P, (1974)4 SCC 267. “The rule of benefit of reasonable doubt does not imply a frail willow bending to everywhiff of hesitancy. Judges are made of sterner stuff and must take a practical view of legitimate inferences flowing from evidence, circumstantial or direct.” The role of courts in such circumstances assumes greater importance and it is expected of the courts to deal with like one on hand, cases in a more 16 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 20/11/2025 12:45:21 pm ) Crl.A(MD)No.407 of 2022 realistic manner and not allow the criminals to go scot-free on account of procedural technicalities, perfunctory investigation or insignificant lacunas in the evidence as otherwise serious crimes would go unpunished. The courts are expected to be sensitive in cases involving crime against women.”
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 28 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1   2 Next