Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)

Ram Charitra (At: 02:00 P.M.) vs Board Of Revenue U.P. At Lucknow Thru ... on 30 January, 2013

18. In the present case there is a transitory provision contained in Section 10 of the amendment Act which save only those proceedings which were pending before the Board of Revenue. Thus, the proceeding which was pending before the Additional Commissioner on 18.08.1997 was required to be decided under the provisions of Section 219 of the amended Act. We are, therefore, unable to subscribe to the view taken by the learned Judge in Kali Shanker Dwivedi (supra) and agree with the view taken in Sri Ram (supra)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ravi Shanker Dwivedi vs The Board Of Revenue And 5 Ors. on 24 March, 2021

18. In the present case there is a transitory provision contained in Section 10 of the amendment Act which save only those proceedings which were pending before the Board of Revenue. Thus, the proceeding which was pending before the Additional Commissioner on 18.08.1997 was required to be decided under the provisions of Section 219 of the amended Act. We are, therefore, unable to subscribe to the view taken by the learned Judge in Kali Shanker Dwivedi (supra) and agree with the view taken in Sri Ram (supra)."
Allahabad High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - A Bhanot - Full Document
1