Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.22 seconds)Section 10 in The Punjab Land Revenue Rules [Entire Act]
Section 218 in The U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 [Entire Act]
Ram Charitra (At: 02:00 P.M.) vs Board Of Revenue U.P. At Lucknow Thru ... on 30 January, 2013
18. In the present case there is a transitory provision contained in Section 10 of the amendment Act which save only those proceedings which were pending before the Board of Revenue. Thus, the proceeding which was pending before the Additional Commissioner on 18.08.1997 was required to be decided under the provisions of Section 219 of the amended Act. We are, therefore, unable to subscribe to the view taken by the learned Judge in Kali Shanker Dwivedi (supra) and agree with the view taken in Sri Ram (supra)."
Ravi Shanker Tripathi Son Of Shri Sangam ... vs Board Of Revenue Through Its Chairman ... on 15 November, 2006
Therefore, learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the facts and circumstances of the present case are similar to that of Shri Ram (supra), thus, in view of the decision of this Court in re; Shri Ram (supra) and Ravi Shanker Tripathi (supra), this writ petition is liable to be allowed.
Section 333A in The U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [Entire Act]
Ravi Shanker Dwivedi vs The Board Of Revenue And 5 Ors. on 24 March, 2021
18. In the present case there is a transitory provision contained in Section 10 of the amendment Act which save only those proceedings which were pending before the Board of Revenue. Thus, the proceeding which was pending before the Additional Commissioner on 18.08.1997 was required to be decided under the provisions of Section 219 of the amended Act. We are, therefore, unable to subscribe to the view taken by the learned Judge in Kali Shanker Dwivedi (supra) and agree with the view taken in Sri Ram (supra)."
1