Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.32 seconds)
The vs State Of Rajasthan (1997) 6 Scc 241) Only ... on 5 May, 2009 cites

Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997

32. Though the learned senior counsel for the petitioner union fairly submitted that there is no law either in the State Government or in the Central Government with regard to the recognition of the trade union or in regard to the implementation of the committee report, he would cite the Ruling of the Supreme Court in VISHAKA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN (1997) 6 SCC 241) only to bring to the notice of this Court that any international conventions and norms, consistent with the fundamental rights and in harmony with its spirit must be read into these provisions to enlarge the meaning and content to promote the object of the constitutional guarantee. He would also contend that the executive powers of the Union shall extend to the matters with respect to which parliament has power to make laws. The executive power of the Union is, therefore, available till Parliament enacts legislation to expressly provide measures needed to curb the evil. He would contend that law is not static. When there is no specific law provided for, still the international conventions, recommendations in respect of such non statutory matter can always be looked into and submitted that unless the interim order is extended and made absolute, any settlement arrived at by the 6th respondent with the Management would hamper the interest of the petitioner Union.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 569 - Full Document
1