Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.23 seconds)Section 6 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
Section 108 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent And Eviction) Control Act, 1960
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 14 in Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 [Entire Act]
Sarojamma vs Shankar on 13 May, 1993
9. To substantiate his argument, Sri Ravindranath cited before me the reported decision of this Court in Sarojamma and Others v Shankar, on the point that readiness of tenant to effect necessary repairs at his own cost does not take away the operation of Section 44 of the Act, Om Prakash and Others v Ram Kumar and Others, on the point that unless a party seeks a relief, it was not available for a Court to grant that relief and lastly Mahaboob Saheb v V. Anjaneyulu, wherein the learned Single Judge of this Court held that a Court should not pass unintelligible order without applying its mind to the facts of the case.
Eashwar vs B. Sudershan And Anr. on 17 November, 1983
20. The learned Counsel for the other side Sri Varadarajan had also placed reliance on the decision of Andhra Pradesh High Court, in Eash-war's case, supra. As I see, it is only having a persuasive effect and in the said decision, the Andhra Pradesh High Court held in a suit as hereunder:
1