Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.19 seconds)Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. vs Jerro on 18 December, 1999
3. It is not disputed that the worker was travelling in the transport provided by the employer and he suffered the injury while in transit from the place of employment to his residence. As such the learned Counsel appearing for the Corporation relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Employees' State Insurance Corporation v. Francis De Costa , and Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. v. Jerro 2001 (1) KLT 643, contended that the injury sustained was not out of and in the course of employment and as such it is not an employment injury to attract the provisions of the E.S.I. Act. But Section 51-C is an answer to this contention.
Section 75 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Explosive Substances Act, 1908
1