Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)Section 4 in The Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
State Of Orissa And Anr vs Saroj Kumar Sahoo on 7 December, 2005
"As noted above, the powers possessed by the High Court under
Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. are very wide and the very plenitude of
the power requires great caution in its exercise. Court must be
careful to see that its decision in exercise of this power is based on
sound principles. The inherent power should not be exercised to
stifle a legitimate prosecution. The High Court being the highest
6
court of a State should normally refrain from giving a prima facie
decision in a case where the entire facts are incomplete and hazy,
more so when the evidence has not been collected and produced
before the Court and the issues involved, whether factual or legal,
are of magnitude and cannot be seen in their true perspective
without sufficient material. Of course, no hard and fast rule can
be laid down in regard to cases in which the High Court will
exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction of quashing the proceeding
at any stage.
Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Abhinandan Jha & Ors vs Dinesh Mishra(With Connected Appeal) on 17 April, 1967
15. It is now a well settled principle of law that where a final form is filed,
the complainant must be given notice thereof in writing. Even at that stage the
learned Magistrate may take recourse to one of the three notes highlighted by
this Court in Abhinandan Jha and Ors. vs. Dinesh Mishra, AIR 1968 SC 117,
namely :
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
1