Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.27 seconds)M/S. Mamta Silk Mills (P) Ltd. ... vs Commissioner Of Central Excise & ... on 9 March, 2001
(b) Amitex Silk Mills (P) Ltd. v. CCE, Surat 2006 (194) ELT 344
Cce, Mumbai Ii vs M/S. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. on 18 April, 2001
(a) CCE v. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 2001 (43) RLT 514
(Smt.) Smita Pandurang Dalvi, Of Bombay ... vs Ratnakar Dattatraya Patade, Of Bombay, ... on 26 February, 2002
(d) CC, Mumbai v. S.V. Mazumdar
He further submits that the utilization of the entire quantity of raw material has to be considered as used in the manufacture of final products. On this point he relies on the following rulings:
Swadeshi Polytex Ltd vs Collector Of Central Excise on 23 November, 1989
Union Of India And Ors vs Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. And Anr on 19 April, 1995
Acme Metal Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs S.S. Pathak, The Inspector, Central ... on 1 January, 1800
(d) Acme Metal Industries Pvt Ltd. v. S.S. Pathak, The Inspector, C.Ex and Ors.
Titan Industries Ltd. vs Cc on 21 March, 1995
(b) Indian Charge chrome Ltd. v. CC 2001 (138) ELT 609
Cce vs Saharia Krishi Van Prathistan on 4 August, 2003
(b) CCE v. Saharia Krishi Van Prathistan 2003 (58) RLT 308
M/S. Tinplate Co. Of India Ltd. vs Cce, Jsr. on 27 June, 2001
(f) Tinplate Co. of India Ltd. v. CCE
Further he submits that no duty can be raised on imported consumables used in generation of power sold outside. He relies on the following rulings:
1