Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 39 (0.35 seconds)
Amrik Singh vs State Etc. on 26 February, 1975 cites

Manohar Lal Sharma vs Prem Lata And Ors. on 24 April, 1973

(1) One Ram Chand Chopra filed a complaint against Amrik Singh and the facts alleged tended to make out offences under sections 420 and 406 Indian Penal Code . To support the complaint Ram Chand gave his own statement and offered some documentary evidence. The magistrate passed an order for the summoning of the accused because on Consideration of the evidence a prima facie case under section 420 I. P. C. was made out against him. The accused approached the Session Court impugning the magistrate's order on the ground it was not a speaking order and deserved, therefore, to be quashed. He cited authorities of this Court in Manohar Lal Sharma v. Prem Lata, (1973) 9 D.L.T. and Mukarb Karim v. Bundu, (1973) 9 D.L.T. 318. The Additional Sessions Judge found these authorities to be fully applicable to the case and made a recommendation under section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code for the order under attack being set-aside. The revision petition came up before Ansari, J. for hearing.
Delhi High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Madhya Pradesh Industries Ltd vs Union Of India And Others on 16 August, 1965

(29) In M. P. Industries v. Union of India, (supra) relied upon by the petitioners, the interests involved were to the tune of lacs of rupees and the objection attributed ill considered rejection by the Central Government of the revision petition filed with it. The Supreme Court said it was essential that reasons be given by an appellate or revisional tribunal expressly or by reference to those given by the original tribunal but it did not prescribe any particular form or scale of reasons because their nature and elaboration depend necessarily upon the facts of each case. The case under reference was not thought fit for interference in the exercise of Supreme Court's discretionary jurisdiction and the appeal of M.P. Industries was, therefore, dismissed.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 314 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next