O.P. Gupta vs Union Of India & Ors on 3 September, 1987
"29. Exercise of right to suspend an employee may be justified on the facts of a particular case. Instances, however, are not rare where officers have been found to be afflicted by "suspension syndrome" and the employees have been found to be placed under suspension just for nothing. It is their irritability rather than the employee's trivial lapse which has often resulted in suspension. Suspension notwithstanding, non-payment of subsistence allowance is an inhuman act which has an unpropitious effect on the life of an employee. When the employee is placed under suspension, he is demobilized and the salary is also paid to him at a reduced rate under the nick-name of "subsistence allowance", so that the employee may sustain himself. This Court in O.P. Gupta v. Union of India, 1987 (4) SCC 328 : AIR 1987 SC 2257 made the following observations with regard to subsistence allowance (Para 15 of AIR) :