Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 31 (0.26 seconds)
Mico Employees' Association vs State Of Karnataka on 29 March, 1982 cites

Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation ... vs P. C. Sen And Ors. on 28 July, 1978

The dictum of this decision is that the validity of a settlement under Section 12(3) of the Act must be judged on the facts and circumstances of a particular case after ascertaining the part played by the Conciliation Officer under Section 12(2) in a conciliation proceeding properly held by him. My conclusions are also supported by the decision of the Calcutta High Court in The Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. v. P.C. Sen and ors., 1978 II Lab. I.C. 1395 on which reliance was placed by Mr. Pai. The following observations of that High Court in the said case are apposite :--
Calcutta High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ramnagar Cane And Sugar Co. Ltd vs Jatin Chakravorty And Others on 5 May, 1960

In Ramnagar Cane And Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Jatin Chakravorty and Ors., 1961 I LLJ 244 the validity of the settlement in the course of conciliation did not come up for consideration. But only the operation of the settlement under Section 18(3) of the Act and the interaction between that Section and Sections 22 and 24 of the Act came up for consideration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 37 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Workers Of Buckingham And Carnatic Co., ... vs Commissioner Of Labour And Chief ... on 9 August, 1963

In Workers of Buckingham and Carnatic Co. (by Binny and Buckingham and Carnatic Employees Union and Madras Textile Workers' Union) v. Commissioner of Labour and Chief Conciliation Officer and Ors., 1964 1 LLJ 253 the validity of a settlement under Section 12(3) of the Act was upheld by the Madras High Court. Mr. Pai strongly relied on the following observations of the Madras High Court :
Madras High Court Cites 25 - Cited by 9 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next