Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 42 (0.32 seconds)Section 18 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996
Olympus Superstructures Pvt. Ltd. vs Meena Vijay Khetan & Ors. on 11 May, 1999
The learned counsel of the petitioner states that
most important substantive law in this case is Indian Contract Act 1872.
Interpretation of contract falls within contours of Indian Contract Act but the
Award militantly violates the provisions of the same on both count. Section 28
(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 stipulate in an arbitration other
than international commercial arbitration, that the arbitral tribunal shall decide
the dispute submitted to arbitration in accordance with law for the time being in
force in India. Specific Relief Act and Indian Contract act are no doubt
substantive law so Ld. Arbitrator has in my view jurisdiction to decide the
dispute relating to the parties and reliance may be placed upon the case of
Olympus Super Structure Private Limited Vs Meena Vijay Ketan reported in
AIR 1500 SC 2102 and also on the case of Rodemadan India Limited Vs
International Trade Expo Centre Limited reported in AIR 2006 SC 3456."
The Indian Contract Act, 1872
Section 9 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
Rodemadan India Limited vs International Trade Expo Centre ... on 17 April, 2006
The learned counsel of the petitioner states that
most important substantive law in this case is Indian Contract Act 1872.
Interpretation of contract falls within contours of Indian Contract Act but the
Award militantly violates the provisions of the same on both count. Section 28
(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 stipulate in an arbitration other
than international commercial arbitration, that the arbitral tribunal shall decide
the dispute submitted to arbitration in accordance with law for the time being in
force in India. Specific Relief Act and Indian Contract act are no doubt
substantive law so Ld. Arbitrator has in my view jurisdiction to decide the
dispute relating to the parties and reliance may be placed upon the case of
Olympus Super Structure Private Limited Vs Meena Vijay Ketan reported in
AIR 1500 SC 2102 and also on the case of Rodemadan India Limited Vs
International Trade Expo Centre Limited reported in AIR 2006 SC 3456."
Kanchan Udyog Limited vs United Spirits Limited on 19 June, 2017
I have already discussed that the
Ld. Arbitrator was well within his jurisdiction to decide the question, of
substantiate law as provided U/s 28 of the Arbitration and Conciliation
Act 1996 so case of Kanchan Udyog Limited Vs United Spirits Limited
reported in (2017) 8 8CC 237 is of no use to the Objector.