Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.55 seconds)Section 186 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 353 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 332 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Manoj Shokeen vs State (Gnct Of Delhi) And Anr on 20 April, 2022
C.R. No. 132/2019 Azad Singh Vs. The State Page no. 7
&
C.R. No. 135/2019 Manoj Kumar Shokeen Vs. The State & Anr
Similar version is given by Ct. Kanwar Singh Ct. Pawan, Lady Ct.
Balwani and Lady Ct. Sunita, who were present at the spot,
therefore, Section 34 IPC has been added. Hence, petitioner Manoj
Kumar Shokeen cannot say that he was party to some offence and
not to some. However, there is no mention of any threat or
intimidation passed by accused persons in the complainant of Ct.
Pawan or statement of witnesses.
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 195 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Sunil Bansal vs The State Of Delhi [Along With Crl. ... on 24 April, 2007
1. Sunil Vs. State of Delhi, Crl. Rev. P. No. 20/2011
Adalat Prasad vs Rooplal Jindal & Ors on 25 August, 2004
It is settled law that the Court of Metropolitan
Magistrate does not have power to review it's own order (Adalat
Prasad Vs. Roop Lal Jindal & Ors. (2004) 7SCC 338)."