Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.32 seconds)
The Bank Of India vs S.Xavier Moni cites

Reserve Bank Of India vs Bhopal Singh Panchal on 3 November, 1993

6. The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Management of Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi vs. Bhopal Singh Panchal reported in (1994) 1 SCC 541 has recognized the decision of appellate Bank not to treat the suspension period as duty in case of employees got acquittal due to benefit of doubt. Referring the Bank Regulation 46 and interpretation of the said clause by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court has settled the law https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 6/17 W.A.(MD)No.933 of 2021 regarding the employees arrested on criminal charge in the following words:
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 160 - P B Sawant - Full Document

Dy.Inspector Gen.Of Police & Anr vs S.Samuthiram on 30 November, 2012

In Inspector General of Police v. S.Samuthiram [(2013) 1 SCC 598 : (2013) 1 SCC (Cri) 566 : (2013) 1 SCC (L&S) 229], a two-Judge Bench of this Court held that unless the accused has an ''honourable acquittal'' in their criminal trial, as opposed to an acquittal due to witnesses turning hostile or for technical reasons, the acquittal shall not affect the decision in the disciplinary proceedings and lead to automatic reinstatement. But the penal statutes governing substance or procedure do not allude to an ''honourable acquittal''. Noticing this, the Court observed :
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 367 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document
1