Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)
Raj Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 15 November, 2017 cites

State Of U.P.& Ors vs Arvind Kumar Srivastava & Ors on 17 October, 2014

In State of Uttar Pradesh & others Vs. Arvind Kumar Srivastava and others (supra) it has been observed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court that normal rule is that when a particular set of employees is given relief by the Court, all other identically situated persons need to be treated alike by extending that benefit. Not doing so would amount to discrimination and would be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. This principle needs to be applied in service matters more emphatically as the service jurisprudence evolved by this Court from time to time postulates that all similarly situated persons should be treated similarly. Therefore, the normal rule would be that merely because other similarly situated persons did not approach the Court earlier, they are not to be treated differently.
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 1005 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Darshan Lal Nagpal & Ors vs Govt.Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 3 January, 2012

4.3 O.A.Nos.3304 of 2013(Samay Singh and four others Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another), 2889 of 2014(Lala Ram Bairwa Vs. Page 6 of 13 7 OAs 3457,3634,3635 & 3661/15 and OA 665/16 DSSSB and another), and 1530 of 2015 (Umesh Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another) were also filed by some other SC candidates of the recruitment examination for Post Code 77/09 of Advertisement No.04/2009 claiming same benefits as extended to the applicants in O.A.No.1687/2011 and O.A.No.1123 of 2013 (cited supra). The Tribunal disposed of the said O.As. in 2014 and 2015 with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgments referred to in the orders and to take appropriate decision. 4.4 It has been emphatically asserted by the applicants that in compliance with the aforesaid orders, the respondent-DSSSB has already considered the claims of the applicants in those cases and selected and nominated them for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse (Post Code 77/09, Advertisement No.004/2009). Accordingly, the applicants in those cases have been appointed to the post of Staff Nurse.
Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 53 - G S Singhvi - Full Document

Sh. Sanjay Kumar vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi Through on 13 February, 2012

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI In compliance of orders of Ld.CAT dated 13.08.2014 as passed in OA No.3304/2013 case titled - Sh. Samay Singh & Ors. Vs. GNCTD the candidates with following particulars have been provisionally selected to the post of Staff Nurse, Health & Family Welfare Department, GNCTD in the Pay Scale of Rs.9300-34800/-GP-4600/- under the post code-77/09.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Umesh Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Services Selection ... on 24 April, 2015

4.3 O.A.Nos.3304 of 2013(Samay Singh and four others Vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and another), 2889 of 2014(Lala Ram Bairwa Vs. Page 6 of 13 7 OAs 3457,3634,3635 & 3661/15 and OA 665/16 DSSSB and another), and 1530 of 2015 (Umesh Kumar Vs. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and another) were also filed by some other SC candidates of the recruitment examination for Post Code 77/09 of Advertisement No.04/2009 claiming same benefits as extended to the applicants in O.A.No.1687/2011 and O.A.No.1123 of 2013 (cited supra). The Tribunal disposed of the said O.As. in 2014 and 2015 with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the applicants in the light of the judgments referred to in the orders and to take appropriate decision. 4.4 It has been emphatically asserted by the applicants that in compliance with the aforesaid orders, the respondent-DSSSB has already considered the claims of the applicants in those cases and selected and nominated them for appointment to the post of Staff Nurse (Post Code 77/09, Advertisement No.004/2009). Accordingly, the applicants in those cases have been appointed to the post of Staff Nurse.
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1