Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.26 seconds)
All Delhi Sc St Nurses Welfare ... vs M/O Personnel,Public Grievances And ... on 13 December, 2018
cites
THE CONSTITUTION (SEVENTY-SEVENTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 1995
Article 335 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
M.Nagaraj & Others vs Union Of India & Others on 19 October, 2006
In these circumstances, and in view of the decisions of the
Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Apex Court in M. Nagaraj
(supra) and Jarnail Singh and Others (supra), the O.A. is
disposed of, without expressing any specific view on the
impugned action of the respondent-authorities, by directing
the respondents, after calling for fresh representations from
both the applicants as well as all other affected employees, on
their action or proposed action, to reconsider the issue of
application of rule of reservation in promotions by duly keeping
in view the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in M.
Nagaraj (supra) and Jarnail Singh and Others (supra) and to
pass appropriate speaking and reasoned orders, within four
months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No
costs.
Suresh Chand Gautam vs State Of Uttar Pradesh . on 11 March, 2016
f. Suresh Chand Gautam v. State of U.P. & Ors., (2016) 11 SCC
113 (two-Judge Bench) (See paragraphs 2 and 45).
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY-FIRST AMENDMENT) ACT, 2000
THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 2000
THE CONSTITUTION (EIGHTY-FIFTH AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002
Sh. Dhanraj Pillay And Others vs M/S Hockey India Main Order , Per R. ... on 31 May, 2013
Hon'ble Sh. V. Ajay Kumar, Member(J)
MA No. 141/2018 filed for joining together is allowed.