Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.79 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 141 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Mahbub Shah vs Emperor on 31 January, 1945
It would be noticed
that cases to which s. 34 can be applied disclose an element
of participation in action on the part of all the accused
persons. The acts may be different; may vary in their
character, but they are all actuated by the same common
intention. It is now well-settled that the common intention
required by s. 34 is different from the same intention or
similar intention. As has been observed by the Privy
Council in Mahbub Shah v. King Emperor (1), common intention
within' the meaning of s. 34 implies a pre-arranged plan,
and to convict the accused of
(1) (1945) L.R. 72. I.A.- 148.
Dalip Singh And Others vs State Of Punjab on 15 May, 1953
In Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab
(1) this Court has held that before section 149 can be
applied, the Court must be satisfied that there were it
least five persons sharing the common object. It has also
been held that this does not mean that five persons must
(1) [1954] S.C.R. 145.