Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 156 (0.51 seconds)Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 309 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 26 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Parshotam Lal Dhingra vs Union Of India on 1 November, 1957
(vi) Sekhar Roy (supra) 11 & 13-15), (vii) Parshotam Lal Dhingra (supra) (para-
5, 11, 26 & 28), (viii) Samsher Singh (supra) (para 63, 65), (ix)Naresh Kumar
(supra), and (x) Bihari Lal Sidhana (supra).
Section 25 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Ashok Kumar Sonkar vs Union Of India & Others on 23 February, 2007
18. Ashok Kumar Sonkar v. Union of India, (2007) 4 SCC 54
Article 310 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Satya Narayan Athya vs High Court Of M.P. & Anr on 24 November, 1995
75) In the case of Pratap Singh (supra), the Supreme Court of India
had referred to the decision in the case of Dharam Singh (supra), and held that
as the appellant was appointed only against a temporary post, they cannot be
treated as confirmed employee and in the case of Dharam Singh (supra) and
Satya Narayan Athya (supra), it was held that deemed extension would mean
that the person would be deemed to continue as a probationer. In this case, the
Page No.# 85/134
distinguishing fact is that the appellants have successfully demonstrated that
they were allowed to hold substantive post.