Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4 (0.25 seconds)State Of Rajasthan vs Daulat Ram on 23 January, 1980
The Single Judge has placed reliance on State of Rajasthan v. Daulat Ram, (2), wherein it has been held that where all link witnesses were not examined so as to satisfy the court that the samples in the case under the Opium Act had not changed hands, or had not been tampered with, then it become a case where a lacunae was left in the prosecution case.
The Opium Act, 1878
Kizito E.L. Ibe vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 31 August, 1989
In the case of Kizito E.L. Ibe v. C.B.I., (1), the material witness was not examined who was to establish the important link pertaining to the samples of the case property. A Single Judge of this Court held that it becomes a case where a very material witness, who besides proving the important link of the the prosecution evidence in relation to seal used on the samples parcels and other seized commodity, would have also given a lie to the defense suggestion by coming into the witness box, but he has either stayed away, or deliberately kept away. The court then held that the trial court certainly erred in holding the prosecution case proved in face of such glaring lacunae in the case.
1