Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 34 (0.26 seconds)

Sakiri Vasu vs State Of U.P. And Others on 7 December, 2007

In view of the settled position in Sakiri Vasu case, the impugned judgment of the High Court cannot be sustained and is hereby set aside. The Magistrate concerned is directed to ensure proper investigation into the alleged offence under Section 156(3) CrPC and if he deems it necessary, he can also recommend to the SSP/SP concerned a change of the investigating officer, so that a proper investigation is done. The Magistrate can also monitor the investigation, though he cannot himself investigate (as investigation is the job of the police). Parties may produce any material they wish before the Magistrate concerned. The learned Magistrate shall be uninfluenced by any observation in the impugned order of the High Court."
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 8229 - M Katju - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next