Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.62 seconds)
Smt. Veeramma W/O Channabasayya ... vs Veerabhadrayya S/O Shivayogayya ... on 10 September, 2025
cites
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 6 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 8 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 14 in The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020
NC: 2025:KHC-D:11737-DB
RFA No. 100282 of 2022
C/W RFA No. 100132 of 2022
RFA No. 100251 of 2022
HC-KAR
concluded that, notwithstanding the acquisition and
compensation, the plea of an earlier/prior partition set up by the
defendants had not been established as required under law. The
Trial Court also notices the fact that the plaintiff, being a
daughter, the plea of earlier partition would necessarily have to
be established by producing cogent and valid evidence, as the
standard of proof in this regard is very high, as held by the
Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Vineeta Sharma Vs. Rakesh
Sharma and Other1, wherein it is held as under:
The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
1