Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.29 seconds)State Of Haryana & Ors vs Rani Devi & Anr on 15 July, 1996
In Rani
Devi case ((1996) 5 SCC 308 : 1996 SCC (L&S) 1162 :
Lic vs Asha Ramchandra Ambekar on 28 February, 1994
In LIC of India v.
Asha Ramchandra Ambekar (Mrs) and Another,
((1994) 2 SCC 718 : 1994 SCC (L&S) 737 : (1994) 27
ATC 174) it was pointed out that High Courts and
Administrative Tribunals cannot confer benediction
impelled by sympathetic considerations to make
appointments on compassionate grounds when the
regulations framed in respect thereof do not cover and
contemplates such appointments.
Umesh Kumar Nagpal vs State Of Haryana (Sawant, J.) on 4 May, 1994
It was noted in
Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana, (1994) 4
SCC 138 : 1994 SCC (L&S 930 : (1994) 27 ATC 537)
that as a rule in public service appointment should be
made strictly on the basis of open invitation of
applications and merit. The appointment on
compassionate ground is not another source of
recruitment but merely an exception to the aforesaid
requirement taking into consideration the fact of the
death of employee while in service leaving his family
without any means of livelihood."
Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Public Instructions & ... vs K.R. Vishwanath on 30 August, 2005
In Commissioner of Public Instructions and others
Vs. K.R. Vishwanath, (2005) 7 SCC 206, the Apex Court,
after referring to the decisions rendered in State of Haryana
and Others Vs. Rani Devi and Another, (1996) 5 SCC 308;
Life Insurance Company of India Vs. Asha Ramchandra
Ambekar (Mrs) and Another, (1994) 2 SCC 718; and, Umesh
Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana and others, (1994) 4 SCC
138, has opined thus:
1