Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.24 seconds)

Government Of Andhra Pradesh Etc. Etc vs P. Dilip Kumar And Anr. Etc. Etc on 3 February, 1993

23. Applying the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P. Dilip Kumar (Supra), to the facts of the present case, this Court finds that the APSC authorities had not committed any error in excluding the petitioners from the selection process at the stage of the written examination, on they being found to have not secured the cut-off marks as determined in the matter. The preferential qualification as set out in the advertisement admittedly had no application at the stage of the written examination and the same was mandated to be applied in respect of candidates, possessing such preferential qualification, on they succeeding in all the stages of the selection process. Accordingly, this Court does not find any prejudice being caused to the petitioner, in the matter, as their exclusion from the Page No.# 21/21 selection process was on account of their below par performance in the written examination.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 169 - A M Ahmadi - Full Document

Mohd. Aslam @ Bhure vs Union Of India & Ors on 31 March, 2003

In view of the above decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of YVVR Srinivasulu (Supra), in the event the contention of the petitioners is to be accepted, it would amount to first including the petitioners in the select list, dehors their inter-se merit performance, only by reckoning the preferential qualification possessed by them and thereafter to consider separately those who does not possess such preferential qualification. In a selection process like the one in the present case, inter-se merit performance should be the decisive factor for actual selection for appointment. Relief cannot be granted to the petitioners for the mere asking only on the basis of the fact that they possessed the Page No.# 18/21 preferential qualification set out in the advertisement irrespective of their individual performance in the selection process.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 137 - Full Document
1