Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.26 seconds)THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
Section 20 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Sathyanath vs Sarojamani on 6 May, 2022
25. Although in view of findings on issue No.2 this court lack
jurisdiction to decide the case on merits but Order 14 Rule 2 CPC
mandates this court to render findings on all issues as the issue
relating to jurisdiction was not pure question law. Reliance may
be had to Supreme Court's ruling in Sathyanath v. Sarojamani.
(bearing Civil Appeal No. 3680 of 2022 decided on 06.05.2022)
wherein it was held that even an issue relating to jurisdiction
cannot be tried as a preliminary issue if it is a mixed question of
law and fact requiring evidence. In such cases, the court must
decide the issue along with all other issues. Further, under Order
XIV Rule 2 CPC (post-amendment), the court is required to
record findings on all issues and pronounce judgment
comprehensively, even if the issue of jurisdiction is ultimately
decided against it.
Central Bank Of India vs Ravindra And Ors on 18 October, 2001
In Central Bank of India v. Ravindra (2002) 1 SCC 367, the
Supreme Court held interest must be reasonable. In the case of
Cimmco Limited Versus Pramod Krishna Agrawal 2019 SCC
OnLine Del 7289, it is held as follows:
Rajendra Construction Company vs Maharashtra Housing & Area Development ... on 12 August, 2005
Reliance is placed
upon the judgments in the cases of Rajendra
Construction Co. v. Maharashtra Housing & Area
Development Authority, (2005) 6 SCC 678, McDermott
International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd., (2006) 11
SCC 181, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v.
Mcdermott International Inc vs Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2006
Reliance is placed
upon the judgments in the cases of Rajendra
Construction Co. v. Maharashtra Housing & Area
Development Authority, (2005) 6 SCC 678, McDermott
International Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd., (2006) 11
SCC 181, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v.
Krishna Bhagya Jala Nigam Ltd vs G. Harischandra Reddy And Anr on 10 January, 2007
State Of Rajasthan & Anr vs M/S. Ferro Concrete Construction ... on 22 April, 2009
The Companies Act, 1956
1