National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Anjana Shyam & Ors on 20 August, 2007
5. Learned Counsel for the
contested the said sumnissions'. 'c£$iitenxi'eti..é:ii1alj,_fit1e >
appellant is appmbating and figjneipies of
acquiescence is attxacted-,..V:i13_ ii1ai;;:V.ai':titti1:er claim which
arose out of the saiiie aecideijt L.Rs of one
Imam Sabfidaaaiii wherein the award
was pasaxed: on ..which was modified and
enhanced' N€;..5'5§V3/2005 on 27.9.2006, was
by'. me and hence it is not open to the
anything contrary. Learned Counsel
conterxgiedx {he appellant admittedly issued a policy of
" i:'v"i1;is:Iiirancevvif} respect of the vehicle which had the carrying
A of 1:2 + 1 passengers and the poiicy of insurance
':'was..i:u1Tent on the date ofthe accident and hence is liable
VA satisfy the award passed by the Tribimal. citccl
the decision of the Hon'bie Supreme Court rendered in the
11
case of National Insurance Co., Ltd... Vs.
Shyam reported in 2007 AIR saw 523? and n
that the contention raised by the learned _A
appellant is squarely covered.