Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 40 (0.03 seconds)The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co., Ltd vs Workmen And Ors. Etc on 27 September, 1968
It is true that under the Act the Labour Court and the Tribunals have full powers to adjudicate upon all matters in dispute between the employers and workmen and give adequate relief. But, at the same time, it should be remembered that a Labour Court to a Tribunal cannot grant relief not claimed by workmen. Likewise, it will have no jurisdiction to award relief in excess of the demand of workmen, nor can it grant relief with respect to disputes not referred to it. In Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Limited v. Its Workmen (supra), the Supreme Court held that the Industrial Court cannot grant relief to workmen with respect to disputes not referred to it because it cannot proceed to adjudicate disputes not referred....
M/S. Polyglass Acrylic Mfg..Co.Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, ... on 31 March, 2003
... The decision of this Court is not an authority for the proposition that apart from a project or a scheme of temporary duration, Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act will have no application. Furthermore, in the instant case, as has been noticed by this Court in S.M. Nilajkar v. Telecom District , itself, the respondent was categorically; informed that as per the terms of the contract, the same was a short-lived one and would be liable to termination as and when the appellant thought it fit or proper or necessary to do so. Yet again, this Court in view of the facts and circumstances prevailing therein had no occasion to consider the second part of Section 2(oo)(bb) of the said Act....
Hydro (Engineers) Pvt. Ltd vs The Workmen on 30 April, 1968
In Hydro (Engineers) (P) Ltd. (supra), this principle was reiterated.
Management Of R.S. Madhoramand Sons ... vs Its Workmen on 14 November, 1963
In Inder Singh (supra), the Supreme Court held that while deciding on the date from which the relief should be given, the Industrial Tribunal ought to pay particular attention to the date when the demand was first made.
Surendranagar District Panchayat vs Dahyabhai Amarsinh on 25 October, 2005
In Surendranagar District Panchayat v. Dahyabhai Amarsingh , the Supreme Court held thus:
Karnataka State Rd Trans. Corp.&Ano vs S.G.Kotturappa&Anr on 3 March, 2005
In Karnataka SRTC v. S.G. Kotturappa , the Supreme Court held thus: