Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.48 seconds)Section 406 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 420 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Som Mittal vs Government Of Karnataka on 21 February, 2008
The purport of the expression "rarest of rare cases", to which reference was made by Shri Venugopal, has been explained recently in Som Mittal (2) v. State of Karnataka(2008) 3 SCC 574. Speaking for a Bench of three Judges, the Hon'ble the Chief Justice said : (SCC pp. 580-81, para 9)
''9. When the words "rarest of rare cases" are used after the words "sparingly and with circumspection" while describing the scope of Section 482, those words merely emphasise and reiterate what is intended to be conveyed by the words "sparingly and with circumspection". They mean that the power under Section 482 to quash proceedings should not be used mechanically or routinely, but with care and caution, only when a clear case for quashing is made out and failure to interfere would lead to a miscarriage of justice. The expression "rarest of rare cases" is not used in the sense in which it is used with reference to punishment for offences under Section 302 IPC, but to emphasise that the power under Section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR or criminal proceedings should be used sparingly and with circumspection.'"
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
State Of U.P.Thr.Secy Basic Education ... vs Rakesh Kumar Verma on 20 July, 2010
15. Accordingly, the application is allowed. The order dated 15.04.2013, passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Court No.32, Lucknow in Case Crime No.472 of 2013; State Vs. Rakesh Kumar Verma and others, Case Crime No.275 of 2012, whereby the aforesaid court has taken cognizance of offence under Sections 406/420 I.P.C. and summoned the applicant to face the trial and the entire proceedings of the aforesaid are quashed.
Section 415 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Google India Private Ltd vs M/S. Visakha Industries on 10 December, 2019
9. The expression "rarest of rare cases" used by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhajan Lal has been explained in Google India (P) Ltd. v. Visaka Industries, (2020) 4 SCC 162 in the following words: -
Jeffrey J.Diermeier & Anr vs State Of West Bengal & Anr on 14 May, 2010
"43. As to what is the scope of the expression "rarest of rare cases" indicated in para 103, we may only refer to the judgment of this Court in Jeffrey J. Diermeier v. State of W.B.,(2010) 6 SCC 243 wherein the law laid down by a Bench of three Judges in Som Mittal (2) v. State of Karnataka (2008) 3 SCC 574 has been referred to : (Jeffrey J. Diermeier case(2010) 6 SCC 243, SCC p. 252, para 23)
"23.