Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (3.42 seconds)Section 18 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
Section 24 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Land Acquisition Act, 1894
Hookiyar Singh Etc. Etc vs Special Land Acquisition ... on 14 March, 1996
The Division Bench primarily had dealt with the facts and circumstances of the case and considered various contentions raised on behalf of the claimants and the State in relation to the enhancement or otherwise of the compensation awarded to the claimants. In the context of the facts of the case the general observations made that there cannot be a doubt that the lands under acquisition are much higher in value than the dry crop lands, was the observation or fact recorded by the Court on the basis of the record before it. Thus, on any analogy or settled cannons of judicial dictum above observations cannot be stated to be any proposition of law. This statement would have to be applied, keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case and the evidence adduced by the parties. The Bench felt that in that case the claimants were entitled to double value of dry crop land. The observations have to be read in its proper perspective and need not be treated as an absolute statement of law. In the case of Hookiyar Singh, the Supreme Court interfered with the market value keeping in view the facts of that case and again no proposition of law was stated, which could be treated as precedent to the case in hand before the learned Single Judge.
Kantaben Manibhai Amin And Another vs The Special Land Acquisition Officer, ... on 27 September, 1989
This proposition can be tested in another way, that is, in the event the claimants led no evidence of the extent of superiority of the land to jirayat land, he would not be entitled to double price of jirayat land in view of the decision in the case of Kantaben Manibhai Amin and Anr. v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Baroda , where only increase of 25% excess compensation was given to the agricultural land.
Asstt. Collector Of Estate Duty Madras vs V. Devaki Ammal, Madras on 17 November, 1994
In this regard, it will be appropriate to make a reference to the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Assistant Collector of Estate Duty, Madras v. Smt. V Devki Ammal, Madras and Bhagwan Dass Arora v. First Additional District Judge, ampur and Ors. .
Bhagwan Dass Arora vs First Additional District Judge, ... on 25 July, 1983
In this regard, it will be appropriate to make a reference to the judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases of Assistant Collector of Estate Duty, Madras v. Smt. V Devki Ammal, Madras and Bhagwan Dass Arora v. First Additional District Judge, ampur and Ors. .
Fitrat Raza Khan vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 1 December, 1981
In this regard reference can also be made to the cases of Fitrat Raza Khan v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. , Bachan Singh v. The State of Punjab etc; etc.